EDR 1.1

RESEARCH APRACHES

google docs

EDR1 COMPARTIVE CHART

1.1 Activity. Research Approaches.txt

EDUCATIONAL REEARCH CLASS

Deliverable:

Comparative table “1.1 Research Approaches Table”

Assessment Criteria:

Criterion

Score

Describes the main characteristics of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the epistemological principles of the three research approaches

10%

Describes the research process of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the main associated paradigms of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the recurrent methods used in the three research approaches

15%

Describes the advantages of the three research approaches

10%

Describes the limitations of the three research approaches

10% 

Maintains careful spelling and wording, and references bibliography according to APA standards

 5%

Submits the document on time and in the correct format on the platform

5% 

Total

100%

Bibliographic Resources:

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://oscarjaramillo.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/version-nueva-Creswell-2008-Research-Design.pdf
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611786.pdf
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/106361_book_item_106361.pdf

Criterion

Score

Describes the main characteristics of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the epistemological principles of the three research approaches

10%

Describes the research process of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the main associated paradigms of the three research approaches

15%

Describes the recurrent methods used in the three research approaches

15%

Describes the advantages of the three research approaches

10%

Describes the limitations of the three research approaches

10% 

Maintains careful spelling and wording, and references bibliography according to APA standards 

 5%

Submits the document on time and in the correct format on the platform
Category | Quantitative Research | Qualitative Research | Mixed Methods Research |
 | – | - | ———— |
Main Characteristics | • Uses numerical data.
• Aims for measurement, prediction, and generalization.
• Structured, objective, and controlled.
• Focuses on variables and statistical relationships. | • Uses non-numerical data (words, meanings, experiences).
• Aims to understand subjective viewpoints.
• Flexible, interpretive, and context-dependent.
• Focuses on depth, complexity, and social meaning. | • Integrates quantitative + qualitative data.
• Seeks a more complete understanding of a phenomenon.
• Uses systematic procedures to combine both approaches.
• Provides corroboration, expansion, and triangulation. |
Epistemological Principles | • Positivism / post-positivism.
• Reality is objective and measurable.
• Knowledge is obtained through observation and statistical analysis. | • Constructivism / interpretivism.
• Reality is socially constructed.
• Knowledge emerges from participants’ perspectives. | • Pragmatism.
• Reality is complex and can be understood through multiple forms of evidence.
• Knowledge is useful when it solves problems. |
Research Process | 1. Identify variables.
2. Formulate hypotheses.
3. Design instrument and sample.
4. Collect numerical data.
5. Analyze using statistics.
6. Interpret results. | 1. Identify phenomenon to explore.
2. Select participants purposively.
3. Collect data through interviews, observation, or documents.
4. Code and categorize data.
5. Interpret patterns and meanings. | Sequential or concurrent:
• Design integration strategy.
• Collect quantitative & qualitative data.
• Analyze separately or jointly.
• Integrate findings for interpretation.
• Draw meta-inferences. |
Associated Paradigms | • Positivist
• Post-positivist | • Constructivist
• Interpretive
• Critical theory (in some studies) | • Pragmatic paradigm |
Recurrent Methods | • Experiments
• Surveys
• Quasi-experiments
• Statistical modeling | • Case studies
• Ethnography
• Narrative research
• Phenomenology
• Grounded theory | • Explanatory sequential (QUAN → QUAL)
• Exploratory sequential (QUAL → QUAN)
• Convergent parallel (QUAN + QUAL) |
Advantages | • Produces reliable, generalizable results.
• Allows prediction and statistical testing.
• High level of control. | • Provides rich, in-depth understanding.
• Captures emotions, experiences, and meanings.
• Flexible and adaptive. | • Offers comprehensive understanding.
• Compensates for weaknesses of a single approach.
• Enables triangulation of results. |
Limitations | • May oversimplify complex human experiences.
• Limited to measurable variables.
• May ignore context. | • Findings may not be generalizable.
• Researcher bias may affect interpretation.
• Time-consuming. | • Requires more time and resources.
• Complex design and analysis.
• Integration can be challenging. |
Spelling, Wording & APA | Academic register, formal style, proper citations recommended: Creswell & Creswell (2018), Punch & Oancea (2014). | | |

Suggested APA References to Add at the End

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Punch, K., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

EDR 1.3 THE FORUM

ETHE IMPORTANCE OF EUDACTION RESEARCH

google docs

EDR FORUM REPLY

  1. Based on your reading of the materials, respond in your own words to the following questions:

    Why is research important in education? How do the concepts you learned support the design of a research project?

    Why is research important in education?

    How do the concepts you learned support the design of a research project?

  2. Why is research important in education?

Research is essential in education because it provides evidence that helps teachers select effective strategies, materials, and methodologies. For ESL (English as a Second Language), research is especially important because language learners have diverse needs, learning styles, proficiency levels, and cultural backgrounds. By studying how students acquire vocabulary, grammar, speaking fluency, and reading comprehension, educators can design lessons that genuinely improve language development.

Research also supports the use of innovative approaches,such as gamification. Studies on gamified learning show that points, challenges, rewards, and interactive tasks increase motivation and keep learners engaged. In the ESL classroom, research helps teachers understand which gamified elements best support vocabulary retention, pronunciation practice, confidence building, and real communication skills. Overall, research strengthens teaching quality, ensures that methods are effective for language learners, and helps educators adapt instruction to promote meaningful English learning.

  1. How do the concepts you learned support the design of a research project?

The concepts studied,such as research approaches, problem identification, variables, sampling, and data collection techniques,provide a solid structure for designing a research project, especially in ESL and gamification contexts.

Understanding quantitative and qualitative methods allows the researcher to choose the best way to analyze ESL learning problems

Learning to define a research problem helps narrow the focus, such as examining how gamification impacts vocabulary retention in A1/A2 ESL learners. Identifying variables,such as the type of game, length of exposure, or vocabulary difficulty,allows the project to be structured and measurable.

Concepts like validity and reliability ensure that the results are trustworthy. For example, if an ESL research project investigates how digital games improve speaking fluency, reliable instruments (rubrics, recordings, speaking tasks) must be used.

Overall, these research concepts guide each step of the project: identifying an ESL learning challenge, reviewing existing studies on gamification, choosing an appropriate method, collecting data from learners, and analyzing whether the gamified strategies truly improve English language outcomes. They give the project academic rigor and help ensure that the findings can genuinely support better ESL teaching practices.

EDR 2.1

FORUM DATABASE

google docs

EDR3 ARTICLE RESEARCH

  1. Search for articles related to the topic “emerging technologies in education” in at least 3 databases of your choice.

  2. For each article:

    Describe the search process (keywords, filters, database features). Justify your selection criteria (relevance, authorship, year, peer-review status). Summarize each article briefly (main contribution or finding).

    Describe the search process (keywords, filters, database features).

    Justify your selection criteria (relevance, authorship, year, peer-review status).

    Summarize each article briefly (main contribution or finding).

2.2

PEER REVIED JOURNALS

google docs EDR4 PEER REVIEW JOOURNALS

  1. Adaptive Learning through Artificial Intelligence
  1. Use the IMRaD model steps table to evaluate the chosen article and describe how it meets the requirements of: introduction, method, results, and discussion.

  2. Integrate your evaluations into a Word document titled “2.2 Peer-Reviewed Journals”, write a conclusion on how the article reflects the IMRaD model criteria, and ensure it has careful writing and correct spelling.

  3. Submit the document individually to the assignment dropbox before the submission deadline. Deliverable:

MY CHOIOCE IS a) Adaptive Learning through Artificial Intelligence

  1. Use the IMRaD model steps table to evaluate the chosen article and describe how it meets the requirements of: introduction, method, results, and discussion.

#EDR 2.3 ## INFORMACION SELECTION

google docs

EDR5 2.3 INFORMATION SELECTION

The review includes one reference with a primary information source


The review includes one reference with a secondary information source


The review includes one reference with a tertiary information source


The bibliographic references indicate their types of information

``` 2. Write a review (minimum of 2 pages) answering the question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of technological innovation in 21st-century Mexican education?

  1. Integrate at least one reference from each of the three types of information (primary, secondary, and tertiary) in your review, and indicate in the references section which type each belongs to.

2.3 Information Selection Review: Advantages and Disadvantages of Technological Innovation in 21st-Century Mexican Education

Technological innovation has transformed educational systems around the world, and Mexico is no exception. Over the past two decades, digital tools, online platforms, and new pedagogical technologies have reshaped the teaching–learning process in basic, secondary, and higher education. These changes have generated significant benefits, but they have also exposed structural inequalities and pedagogical challenges. Understanding both the advantages and disadvantages of technological innovation is essential for designing equitable, efficient, and meaningful educational strategies in the Mexican context.

Advantages of Technological Innovation in Mexican Education

One of the most significant advantages is the expansion of access to information. Digital resources such as academic databases, open-access repositories, and interactive platforms allow students and teachers to consult up-to-date scientific knowledge. According to AAMUSTED (2024), the ability to distinguish between primary, secondary, and tertiary information sources equips learners with the skills to navigate the digital environment critically and responsibly. This is particularly valuable in Mexico, where many schools struggle with limited physical library collections. Digital access reduces dependency on printed materials and democratizes the availability of academic content.

Another advantage is the enhancement of teaching practices through digital tools. Learning management systems (LMS), virtual classrooms, and applications such as Google Classroom or Microsoft Teams support differentiated instruction, collaboration, and flexible learning. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Mexican schools accelerated the adoption of these tools, leading to a widespread understanding of their pedagogical potential. Digital technologies also support inclusive education by offering assistive tools for students with disabilities, such as speech-to-text software, captioning services, and accessible formats.

Technological innovation has also facilitated professional development for teachers. Online courses, webinars, and digital communities allow educators to continuously update their knowledge and pedagogical strategies. The Universidad de Alicante (2023) emphasizes that searching for scientific information in digital environments improves educators’ decision-making by grounding instruction in evidence-based practices. As teachers gain the capacity to evaluate reliable sources, they enhance the overall quality of education.

In addition, technology encourages creativity and student engagement. Multimedia resources, simulations, gamification, and interactive tools make learning more dynamic and appealing. These formats are particularly beneficial for younger generations, whose motivation increases when using digital devices that align with their everyday experiences.

Disadvantages and Challenges of Technological Innovation in Mexico

Despite its benefits, technological innovation also presents significant challenges. The most widely recognized issue is the digital divide. Many rural and marginalized communities in Mexico face limited access to stable internet, digital devices, and electricity. As a result, technological integration can unintentionally increase educational inequality, leaving behind students who lack the necessary infrastructure. Research by K. M. K. S. and N. K. G. (2023) indicates that unequal access to information sources disproportionately affects learners from low-income regions, a reality clearly reflected in Mexico’s socioeconomic disparities.

Another challenge is the insufficient digital literacy among teachers and students. Although technology is available in many schools, its effective use is not guaranteed. Some educators struggle to integrate technological tools into their pedagogical planning, resulting in superficial or inefficient use. Training programs are often short-term, uneven, or poorly aligned with teachers’ real classroom needs.

Technological innovation also raises concerns about information overload and misinformation. Without proper training in identifying reliable primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, students may rely on inaccurate or non-academic materials. This makes the development of information literacy skills essential in Mexican schools and universities.

A further disadvantage is the risk of reduced social interaction and over-dependence on devices. Excessive screen time can affect student health, attention, and emotional well-being. In communities where family support for digital learning is limited, students may feel isolated during technology-based activities. This barrier highlights the importance of balanced pedagogical approaches that combine traditional and digital methods.

Finally, the high costs of technological implementation pose significant challenges. Maintaining devices, updating software, improving connectivity, and providing teacher training require sustained national investment. When funding is inconsistent, technological projects may fail to reach their intended goals.

Conclusion

Technological innovation in 21st-century Mexican education presents both remarkable opportunities and notable challenges. While technology expands access to knowledge, enhances instructional quality, and promotes engagement, it also exposes deep structural inequalities and pedagogical limitations. To ensure that innovation contributes positively to Mexico’s educational development, it is essential to promote digital equity, strengthen information literacy, invest in teacher training, and develop long-term educational policies that integrate technology in meaningful and inclusive ways. Only through a balanced and critical approach can technological innovation support the formation of competent, informed, and socially engaged learners in contemporary Mexico.

References

(Each reference includes its information-source type as required.)

Primary Source K. M. K. S., & N, K. G. (2023). Information Sources. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371474685_Information_Sources

EDR 2.4

ACADEMIC PLAGRISM

google docs EDR6 ACADEMIC PLAGRISM

  1. Using the information from the materials, write a monograph in which you describe the phenomenon of academic plagiarism, its main consequences, and how to avoid it. The monograph should be at least 3 pages long, using Times New Roman 12-point font and single-spacing, and include a cover page with personal information.

  2. Use the Guide for Applying APA Standards (7th Edition) and include in the monograph:

    One extended direct narrative citation from a translated book chapter Two parenthetical citations from journal articles with DOI or URL Two paraphrases from YouTube videos A complete and correct list of bibliographic references in APA (7th Edition) format

EDR 3.1

PROBLEM DEFINITION

google docs

  1. Conduct a comprehensive search in academic databases to locate at least four recent (published within the last five years) peer-reviewed research articles related to your topic. For article analysis, you may use digital tools such as https://notebooklm.google/

  2. Write a monograph that includes:

    A clear and concise statement of the research problem. A justification section explaining why the problem should be addressed (pertinence) and what benefits are expected from the study (relevance). Evidence from your selected articles to support your justification.

  3. Format and submit your monograph:

    Save the file as “3.1 Problem Definition.” Submit it in PDF format. Structure your work with an introduction, development, and conclusion. Ensure proper academic writing, spelling, and grammar.

SUBJECT

  1. Conduct a comprehensive search in academic databases to locate at least four recent (published within the last five years) peer-reviewed research articles related to your topic. For article analysis, you may use digital tools such as https://notebooklm.google/

TIPS

Structure your work with an introduction, development, and conclusion.

3.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

RESEARCH QUESTION

google docs

  1. Write a clear and concise statement of the central problem to be addressed in your research.

  2. Formulate a research question that is directly relevant to and coherent with the central problem.

  3. Establish at least three specific objectives that break down the central problem into clearly defined and manageable components.

  4. Propose a hypothesis that is explicit, precise, and logically aligned with the research question.

  5. Organize your work into a table with the following columns:

    Central Problem Research Question Specific Objectives Hypothesis

EDR 3.3

METHLOGICAL DESIGN

google docs

Remember that for analyzing texts and resources, you can use digital tools such as https://notebooklm.google.

  1. Describe the phases of the research project, from the formulation of the problem to the interpretation of the results.

  2. Specify whether the study will follow a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approach, and indicate the research paradigm (positivist, interpretivist, critical, etc.).

  3. Identify the type of study (descriptive, experimental, correlational, etc.) and explain its relevance to the research problem.

  4. Select the data collection methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations, document analysis).

  5. Specify the data analysis methods to be used (e.g., statistical analysis, content analysis).

  6. Provide a brief written justification for the choice of each methodological design component, linking it to the research problem and questions.

  7. Organize the information into a diagram that clearly visualizes the study phases, approach and paradigm, type of study, data collection methods, data analysis methods, and the justification.

  8. You may use digital tools such as https://prezi.com/ to create your diagram.

  9. Save the file as “3.3 Methodological Design” in PDF format including the diagram and written justifications. Ensure proper academic writing, spelling, and grammar.

Deliverable:

Diagram with written justification

  1. Describe the phases of the research project, from the formulation of the problem to the interpretation of the results.

THE PHASE OF MY PROJECTA ARE

  1. Organize the information into a diagram that clearly visualizes the study phases, approach and paradigm, type of study, data collection methods, data analysis methods, and the justification.

EDR 3.4

EXPECTED RESULTS

google docs

  1. Using the current progress of your research project, answer the following guiding questions:

    What type of data is expected to be obtained with the selected methodology? How will these results answer the research question? Is there evidence in prior research that supports these possible results? How are these results related to the objectives of the study?

  2. Identify and formulate the expected results according to their theme and research objectives.

  3. Organize the results in a key diagram, starting with the most general results and subdividing them into specific results.

  4. You may use digital tools such as:

    https://miro.com/ https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/ https://coggle.it/

  5. Prepare your work in a document titled “3.4 Expected Results – Key Diagram”, ensuring that spelling, grammar, and academic style are correct. Include a brief cover page identifying the work.

  6. Save the document in PDF format and submit it before the deadline.

  7. Using the current progress of your research project, answer the following guiding questions:

    What type of data is expected to be obtained with the selected methodology?

    How will these results answer the research question?

    Is there evidence in prior research that supports these possible results?

    How are these results related to the objectives of the study?

What type of data is expected to be obtained with the selected methodology?

How will these results answer the research question?

Is there evidence in prior research that supports these possible results?

EDR 3.5

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK REFERENCE

google docs

  1. Identify the keywords of your research project. You may extract them from your hypothesis, research question, and objectives.

  2. Based on these key terms, select a minimum of four research articles relevant to your topic. Ensure that they are credible and pertinent sources, and identify their main ideas. You may use analysis tools such as https://notebooklm.google.com/?authuser=1

  3. Create a visual presentation that includes:

    Title of the presentation, your name, and the date. A list of the selected articles, including: author(s), year of publication, article title, journal name, volume, issue, and page range. A justification for selecting these articles, explaining why they are relevant to your research and what they contribute to the topic. Definitions of the key terms that will be used in your research and that are essential for understanding the topic. Properly formatted in-text citations and references in accordance with APA 7th edition guidelines, including examples of how citations would appear both in-text and in the reference list.

    Title of the presentation, your name, and the date.

    A list of the selected articles, including: author(s), year of publication, article title, journal name, volume, issue, and page range.

A justification for selecting these articles, explaining why they are relevant to your research and what they contribute to the topic.

Definitions of the key terms that will be used in your research and that are essential for understanding the topic.

Properly formatted in-text citations and references in accordance with APA 7th edition guidelines, including examples of how citations would appear both in-text and in the reference list.

EDR 4.0

google docs

4.0 Integrative Activity Research Protocol

  1. Based on the Research Protocol Template, prepare a research proposal that includes the following sections:
Research Question: Formulate the central question guiding the study.


Hypothesis: Present a clear and testable hypothesis that addresses the research question.



Objectives: Include both the general objective and the specific objectives you aim to achieve.


Justification: Explain the relevance (why) and pertinence (for what purpose) of the study within the educational context.


Methodological Design: Describe the research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed), paradigm (positivist, interpretive, critical, etc.), type of study (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory), and method (experimental, correlational, case study, etc.).




Conceptual Framework: Define the key concepts supporting the research and explain their relationship to the problem.



Expected Results: Indicate the anticipated findings and their possible contributions to the field.
References: Include all consulted sources formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines.



Title: Concisely state the research topic and the researcher’s perspective on the object of study.



Statement of the Problem: Clearly define the problem to be addressed in the research.

Research Question: Formulate the central question guiding the study.

Hypothesis: Present a clear and testable hypothesis that addresses the research question.


Title: Concisely state the research topic and the researcher’s perspective on the object of study.







Statement of the Problem: Clearly define the problem to be addressed in the research.





Research Question: Formulate the central question guiding the study.


Hypothesis: Present a clear and testable hypothesis that addresses the research question.

Objectives: Include both the general objective and the specific objectives you aim to achieve.

Justification: Explain the relevance (why) and pertinence (for what purpose) of the study within the educational context.

Methodological Design: Describe the research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed), paradigm (positivist, interpretive, critical, etc.), type of study (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory), and method (experimental, correlational, case study, etc.).

Conceptual Framework: Define the key concepts supporting the research and explain their relationship to the problem.

Expected Results: Indicate the anticipated findings and their possible contributions to the field.

References: Include all consulted sources formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines.


References: Include all consulted sources formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines.

Here is the clear roadmap for your course Educational Research Methodology and exactly where your big paper (the final Research Protocol) begins, and how all previous assignments connect to it.

✅ Where does your paper start?

Your final paper starts in Unit 3 — Activity 3.1: Problem Definition. This is the foundation of the entire Research Protocol.

Everything before Unit 3 is preparation. Everything after Unit 3 builds on your Problem Definition.

🧱 Structure: How your Research Protocol is built

Think of the entire course like building a house:

UNIT 1 → Foundations: Understanding research

1.1 Research Approaches → helps you choose if your study is qualitative / quantitative / mixed methods

1.2 Types and Scope of Research → quiz confirms your basic theory

1.3 Importance of Educational Research → prepares your justification

These do not yet start your paper — they are conceptual.

UNIT 2 → Materials: Finding academic sources

This unit prepares the LITERATURE for your Research Protocol:

2.1 Databases Forum → where to search (ERIC, Scopus, WoS, etc.)

2.2 Peer-Reviewed Journals → guarantees your sources are high quality

2.3 Information Selection → selecting relevant studies

2.4 Academic Plagiarism, Citations, References → APA 7 formatting skills

These activities give you the articles and APA references for your final paper. But your paper still hasn’t started.

🚀 UNIT 3 → NOW your paper begins

This is where you start writing the actual Research Protocol, step by step.

Your paper starts here:

✔ 3.1 Activity: Problem Definition — This is the FIRST PAGE of your paper

This is your real starting point.

Here you write:

The topic (e.g., gamification, English reading comprehension, student anxiety, etc.)

The problem observed

The context (school, learners, level)

Why this problem matters (justification)

What research gap exists

This becomes Section 1 of your final Research Protocol.

✔ 3.2 Research Questions, Objectives, and Hypothesis

This becomes Section 2 of your paper.

You build directly from the problem:

3–4 research questions

General + specific objectives

Hypothesis (if quantitative)

✔ 3.3 Methodological Design

This becomes Section 3 of your paper.

You choose:

Research approach

Research type

Population and sample

Instruments

Procedure

Analysis plan

✔ 3.4 Expected Results

This becomes Section 4.

You explain:

What results you expect

Why those results matter

How this impacts education

✔ 3.5 Conceptual Framework References

This becomes Section 5.

Here you insert:

Concepts

Definitions

Theoretical models

APA references from Unit 2

🎓 FINAL: Integrative Activity – Research Protocol (15%)

This is your full paper.

👉 You simply combine Sections 1–5 from Activities 3.1 to 3.5 into one complete, clean, polished research protocol.

Nothing new — you are just integrating.

📌 SUMMARY — EXACT STARTING POINT

Your research paper officially starts at:

🟩 3.1 Activity: Problem Definition

Everything before that is theory. Everything after that is writing.

⭐ If you want, I can help you RIGHT NOW with:

✅ Writing your Problem Definition ✅ Choosing a topic ✅ Creating your Research Questions ✅ Drafting your entire Research Protocol — exactly how your university expects it

Just tell me:

“My topic is ______. Let’s start with 3.1.”

I’ll build the whole paper with you step-by-step.